I fixed the errors that I was able to fix, and I could guess at what the sources are, but I am more of a gnome than a researcher. I do not feel comfortable implying that I validated a claim based on a source that I have not seen.
– Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Jonesey95, if you google them, you'll find the full citations, if that's what you mean (I didn't check the page numbers.) SarahSV (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the suggestion.
Please ping me if you understand the sources but need help with putting the right code into the article. If any other page watchers can supply these full references, that would be great. It looks like the person who might know where they came from is A.S. I have marked two references on this page as missing: Overy & Wheatcroft 1989, and Crampton 1997. Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC) Missing references Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page.
What is a "milder Nazi"? Is there anyone with more knowledge of Henlein who can flesh this out with specifics? Otherwise, it just sounds like empty excuse making. William Alan Ritch ( talk) 17:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC) German Occupation Heinlein, not Konrad Henlein, the Czech-German politician. Shouldn't this be "Henleinists"? I have not read Gellhorn's book and know nothing about it but "Heinleinists" suggests American SF writer Robert A. Isn't there a rather misleading typo in this sentence: "Heinleinists" are a looming presence throughout Martha Gellhorn's novel "A Stricken Field" (1940)."? I'm referring to "Heinleinists". I was revolted."īlu ( talk) 18:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC) References A slash would be ok, but the method used legitimizes the racist nationaism of Henlein. One clue, the use of German place names for places in Czechoslovakia AFTER 1918. The article is blatantly propagandistic and full of dog-whistles. "I just read the wiki article on Konrad Henlein, Nazi and war criminal. " Marshall46 ( talk) 09:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Ī scholarly friend of mine who is self-admittedly "wiki-challenged" said this after reading this page: Anyway, much the same is already said here: "In the first half of the 1930s, Henlein held a pro-Czechoslovak and overtly anti-Nazi view in his public speeches and did not become a follower of Adolf Hitler until 1937. I don't know whether this is a representative view so I have not placed it in the Henlein article. Hitler of course, more than welcomed the opportunity of making the Sudeten case his own and did not hesitate to misuse the principle of self-determination as a weapon to further his own Lebensraum policy." de Zayas, Alfred-Maurice. It is easy to understand how these notions arose, yet neither Henlein at the outset of his political career nor the SdP for many years of its development had anything to do with the National Socialist movement in Germany. "It has been frequently suggested that Henlein was a sinister schemer and his SdP nothing more than a subversive Nazi organization bent on the destruction of Czechoslovak independence.
I have removed this passage from Sudetenland:
Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 ( talk) 20:11, (UTC) Assessment And what is a "conspirative contact"? Inventing words doesn't exactly clarify what Henlein did.
If Henlein was a British agent, he was very brave, not a coward. WestBohemiaTruthTeller ( talk) 21:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC) He was an alcoholic and committed suicided like a coward for what he had did. He could not ran from his deeds of the past.